Insights

The Gist is the monthly newsletter of The Ad Hoc Group that covers everything at the intersection of climate tech and policy. Subscribe at the link here to have The Gist mailed to your inbox each month.

d4ebd130-ef9d-23de-40f6-e23062a784dd

The Ad Hoc Gist: Cement is Really Hard

This month’s Gist is about concrete and its chief component – cement – one of the truly hard matters of decarbonization, and an emerging focus of new tech and policy innovation.

7f7ef981-6ee5-2b27-0aa9-b16060dbb5cf

The Ad Hoc Gist: Ukraine and the War on Methane

This month’s Gist explains how a war on methane can ensure that we are replacing Russian gas with the cleanest American made alternative to protect both the climate and democracy.

f93f7b77-e258-d756-a697-23dafab9d935

The Ad Hoc Gist: We Need a Gigaton of Carbon Removal

This month’s Gist is about the necessity of carbon removal to achieve our climate goals – and what’s required at the federal, state and market level to accelerate its uptake.

Blog

Follow our blog for updates from The Ad Hoc Group.

People as Moat – Ad Hoc Expands into Search

In climate tech, we talk a lot about, well, technology. But talk with most CEOs and they’ll share that the hardest part of their job is figuring out how to hire and retain the right people. In my experience, a company’s ability to hire and effectively onboard the right people is what differentiates successful businesses from those that falter. Because, as a CEO, you can have a great vision, but if you don’t have the right people, you can’t execute it.

A Conversation with Vida and Devin

We invited two leaders, Devin Hampton, CEO of UtilityAPI, and Vida Asiegbu, principal at Energy Impact Partners, for a candid conversation on equity and representation in the energy transition.

Press

66984c85ad4383681bb9fe0c_Latitude 1920px 32 Image (76)

Know thyself: Advice for climate tech founders

Building a climate tech company is not for the faint-of-heart.

No part of the process is easy; the tech is difficult, customers can be decidedly old-school, and regulation is often complex, for instance. And too often, the innate challenge for founders is compounded by the weight of high valuations, enormous growth targets, and limited exit options.

We don’t have all the answers for navigating what is an increasingly complicated market, but we do have some advice.

Read More @ Latitude Media

6696c2c74ec1315a4c754895_Latitude 1920px 32 Image (72)-p-1600

We need to rethink climate investing

For climate tech to scale, the collaboration between climate tech founders and capital providers will need  to change. It will need to be a durable — and dare we say, sustainable? — relationship, and one designed for deep partnership. 

To get a sense of what this might look like, it is worth looking backward: to the very first days of Silicon Valley venture capital and the case of Intel. The company was founded by Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore with an innovative capital model proposed by Arthur Rock. Intel was given a $2.5 million pre-money valuation in 1968 — the equivalent of $21 million today — and Rock invested $2.5 million.

Read More @ Latitude Media

6695a516a0144fe0f6164b8e_Latitude 1920px 32 Image (66)

Is winter coming for climate tech?

We’re worried about climate tech.

We lived through cleantech 1.0 (b. 2007, d. 2011), and we see signs of similar mistakes unfolding this time around. And the problems are not restricted to a single group. Both founders and venture capitalists need to re-think their approach to the market.

On the one hand, founders need to deeply assess the business they’re building, and create a capital plan that fits their model — not every company is built to be a unicorn. On the other, VCs need to re-assess how they partner with startups, and consider paths that involve more ownership and increased operational expertise. For both sides, it’s time to focus on putting points on the board.

Read More @ Latitude Media

Hear more from our leadership on My Climate Journey and Technopolis.

Technopolis